michael

Do you know what was the name the Greeks gave to the Romanians before the called them Vlachs? And how exactly was it possible for the Byzantine Greeks to called themselves Romans (romaioi) when they were living close to Vlachs?

Bogdan and Bozidar. Which one is "more Slavic", if any?

The Aromanians of Greece with Romanian identity must be expelled to Romania. Those with Aromanian identity must be expelled to any no-man's-land (for instance to the no man's land between Greece and FYROM or Greece and Turkey since there is no Aromanian country to be expelled to. The Aromanians and Slavs of Greece must be made to sign a document (humiliatingly worded) stating they are loyal Greek citizens, don't want the border of Greece to change, that they swear not to do anything against Greek territorial integrity otherwise they agree to be moved by the Greek government to central Greece, in compact Greek areas, so that they would be inhabiting enclaves, far from any Greek border. Followed by a law against national treason with extreme punishments. The same for Bulgaria and Albania. The leaders of the "Macedonian" party of Greece, Albanian and Bulgaria (OMO Ilinden) must be made to sign these documents first in order to serve as examples to the other "Macedonians". The same for the Aromanians, Meglenovlachs, Turks of these two countries.

Check out DrFaust and R4MANIA's posts on novinite.com. They are both Romanians. And tubo is "Macedonian" Start begging Romanians, Serbs, Turks. Otherwise say goodbye to EU membership for good (needless to say that the veto right cannot be taken way)

Sure because a Vlach says so. Serbia Turkey and FYROM ikonomicheski stoyat mnogo po-dobre ot Bygarija? Wrong And it doesnt matter how well a country's economy works or how well it meets the EU-joining standarts (see Bulgaria, Romania cases) only political will. BTW Cyprus is a (Lesser) Asian country member of the European Union. So why no Israel? Israel and Cyprus are Asian countries. Btw Bulgaria has the right and should veto Moldova as well. Present Moldovan authorities intend to join the EU and then merge with Romania. Image Austria president and prime-minister trying to persuade Austrians that they ethnically don't exist, that they are actually Germans. Romanian must not count on the German "precedent" of reunification (Democratic Germany was not a member of European Economic Community/European Union and yet the merging with Federal Germany occured). But this merge occured exactly because no EU country vetoed it. In case of Romania+Moldova Bulgaria has the power to veto Moldova out of the EU indefinitely. If Romania wants to unite with Moldova it will have to get out of European Union first and thus unite with Moldova outside EU.

Also ask the people at novinite to delete all my post under bozhidar and radko. I have asked them like 1000 times but with no success. Must be something Bulgarian, lack of common sense, compassion and human feeling in general

To the admins: pleas delete or change my IP's to random ones. Otherwise if I'm found (I am a Romania traitor) and something happens to me you'll be murder accomplces too (though you as Bulgarians probably have no remorse capabilities)

See what happens if you try to be a smart ass Honterus? You have managed to fool these people but you are going to be accomplice to murder. IDIOT Btw, I have spent a lot of money on (Southern) Dobruja related items: and since I am crazy I have destroyed them: burnt books belonging to Romanian "patrimoniu" etc. All objects relating to Romanian occupation of Southern Dobruja should be destroyed.

I am going to KILL anyone that tried to harm me as a consequence of Romanians' finding out who I am. I am risking my life for you and this is the reward I get.

Veto Serbia , FYROM and Turkey out of EU. Nobody can take away the veto right. And there is already the Slovenian-Croatian precedent

Here are my last advices for you: Make Romanian accept the completion of the population exchange Move all the Muslims from Dobruja, Pirin "Macedonia" and southeastern Bulgaria to central Bulgaria, to a region not bordering Turkey, Romanian or FYROM. This can be done. No one would dare attack a NATO member, not even Turkey. Just move them to the core of Bulgaria. Bozhidar Dimitrov should reconsider asking for billions of euro in compensations. Get out of United Nations just like Japan got out of the Society of Nations (or League of Nations). Nobody can force any country to be member of a united organization if it doesn't want to. Do this in order to escape partition that you will be subjected to if you continue to su** Russians' co** (see Kosovo case)

You idiot you and all these dumb Bulgarians are going to be ACCOMPLICE TO MURDER if you find out who I am. That's the reward I get for risking my life trying to help these Gypsies

Ok . Now I see it. You Bulgarians must be really really stupid indeed. This idiot has managed to fool them. Even if this idiot acknowledges he feels superior to th Bulgarians they are still letting him type insulting this that are against the forum rules.

Spare me the physics lesson. You are not impressing anyone. And you are no longer fooling nobodoy here. You are a logicless person. BTW how are the space settlements? What human settlement is above Bucharest? Is it a rural or an urban one? Or maybe it is a sea? A sea of stupidity, illogicality, self-proclaimed superiority and arrogance. This is the last time I am replying to your posts. You have no counterarguments to what I typed, you are a Romanian stuffed with Romanian superiority cliches taught in all Romanian schools. That's why you refuse to accept the truth. To the administrators of this forum. Please ban this clown. Also check all of his posts on novinite.com like the one in which he is glad the Bulgarian nuclear powerplant reactors were shut down by the EU. He was glad because now Romania has the chance to become the main energy exporter in the region. This idiot doesnt realize the dangers for Bulgaria given the demographic crisis. If poverty continues in Bulgaria, Bulgaria will become a Muslim country. That's why you have to find ways of getting rid of the Muslims. You have the weapons: veto against Turkey, genocide trial proposed (and unfortunately) abandoned by Bozhidar Dimitrov. The only solution is either to reduce the birthrate of Muslim Roma through integration or to give 5000-10 000 sqkm to Turkey and all the Muslims (except for the Pomaks) should be moved there. Unfortunately we're not living in the 1920-1940's so I doubt if the Turkish or Bulgarian government can forcefully relocate the Muslims. You have enough reasons for banning him: insults (bozo and others). The idiot didn;t even know that zh is not z (Bozho is not bozo). He is so stupid to claim that the Earth is flat (his comparison of the Earth with a flat geometrical plan). Speaking of novinite.com That is a forum about Bulgaria, not Romania. He is a troll there, again check out his posts. Check out his post about Stoychkov and his "moronic" behavio(u)r.

Why should Vatican be better than others? Why the positive discrimination of Vatican only? But in Western FYROM, Western Romania and Szekelyfold (the Hungarian compact areas in central Romania) we're talking about many such villages. BTW I see the "Macedonian" government has "rewarded" Zhelyu Zhelev as "champion of "Macedonian" independence". This is a blackmail aimed at preventing Bulgaria from its potential unification plans. Now the Serbs and "Macedonians" are beginning to humiliate themselves since they are aware of Bulgaria's veto power. Where do these "Macedonians" learn such methods? Is there a like school in Belgrade for such "tactics"? Btw the 2 Istro-"Romanian" (why are Rheto-Romans of Switzerland not called Rheto-Romanians?) villages with Istro-Roman indigenous population (I suppose they have been founded by them and they have lived there uninteruptedly) should be independent also. We're talking about Romance/Latin population that is indigenous in those two villages, villages which located north of Jirecek's line, in a territory subjected to Romanization (doesn't matter how complete or incomplete, Romans have lived there before Slavs' arrival). So these Istro-Romans have all the rights to be independent since they are living in a territory that has belonged to and been inhabited by their ancestors, the Romans, before belonging to the Slavs plus they are indigenous in their villages. Either one of these two arguments-conditions is enough for them to claim independence, at least according to Romanian "historians". Btw does the Danube-bordering village Vlashka Rakitova (or Rakovitsa? near Kudelin) still exist? Why is it called Vlashka Rakitova? Was it founded by Vlachs? Maybe you should give Romania this village too, together with Southern Dobruja.

Ochevidno. Please ban this Honterus clown

Enyo is Vlach. He doesn;t even know what he is actually. Bulgarian or Romanian. These statements by Stoyanov are probably written in 1940 when many Bulgarians got carried away by Romania's giving back Southern Dobruja or before 1913. They have zero value in 2010. I see no Romanian speaker (be it the Vlachs or the stupid Honterus) wants to translate fully and correctly the numerous article in the links I provided. Please don't let this Honterus and these Romanian speaking "Bulgarians" (Vlachs) fool you.

Of course it is. When accompanied by indigenousness. Actually you don't need 3 villages. One is enough (see Vatican example)

Please write in English or whatever Slavic language you claim to know. (I have seen you typing in Shtokavian on novinite.com). I bet you speak no Slavic language, neither German. Someone else is probably typing all your texts in Slavic, German. Writing in Romanian shows disrespect towards the other users. Btw you are very stupid. According to you the Earth is flat (plan infinit). Or is a "plan infinit" equal to a space object, in this case a sphere (the Earth)? Obviously on Earth there are no "floors", there are no villages on ground floor and other villages above them. This means space.

I am referring to the villages in Harghita, Mures and Covasna counties, indigenous Hungarian enclaves in Romania. Whenever you find (through the examination of Austrian-Hungarian censuses data) 3 neighboring 100% Hungarian villages (this includes Hungarian-speaking "Roma") you get an indigenous Hungarian enclave in Romania (you need at least 3 points for a geometrical figure and therefore for a geographical territory).

Bulgarian influence in Russian: zhd instead of zh (like in Ukrainian): mezhdu. It is quite extraordinary how Bulgarian language had managed to influence Russian and Serbian. In "Serbian": the "da"-construction instead of infinitive, "will" future (Thracian influence in Bulgarian, perhaps through Romance languages extended in Shtokavian), in the past the use of short dative as possessive pronouns: zemlja mi instead of moja zemlya. The lack of "musical accent" (pitch if I'm not mistaken) (like in Swedish and Norwegian) if present in Shtokavian dialects (other than Torlakian which are Bulgarian dialects) is again due to Bulgarian influence. It is a pity that Bulgarian has been influenced by Russian, considering how the Russians have treated Bulgarians (giving Pirot to Serbia, helping the "Macedonian" codification, giving all Bulgarian territories, most of them rightfully Bulgarian back to Serbia (Yugoslavia) at the end of ww2 etc. etc. etc.) and considering the enormous Bulgarian ("Old Church Slavonic") influence on Russian language. The Ukrainian and epecially the Belarusian (White Russian or White Rusyn/Ruthenian (White Ukrainian?), Belarus does not mean white Russia but white Rus', as in Kievan Rus) language is therefore more Russian than Russian, more Easter-Slavonic than Russian.

Razlog dialect is Eastern Bulgarian dialect, not Gorna Dzumaya. Drug primer: sfat, Scroviste from svet (sveat, "ea" diphthong), sveat=>sfeat, sfat Snagov<=Sneagov ot Snyagovo Scrovishte=Sykrovishte Sometimes the neuter "-ovo" ending village names are masculine in Romanian (Snagov, Ilfov) but mostly feminine (Prahova). Also iezer ot ezero but sita, sUta ot sito, sto. Also the compound names with liaison "-o-" (Balgrad-now Alba Iulia, just like the Serbian Beograd, Bg. Belgrad, not Belograd). This binding "-o" is probably from Greek although there are also "-e-" and "-i" in Slavic languages (generalization of Greek "-o-"?) Hidden Romance (Romanian or remnants of "deceased" Romance languages spoken between Romanian and Dalmatian territory: sbor, sboruvam (from cuvant from conventus/conventum), sedmitsa (from saptamana+sedem, chrez kalkirane), sreshtu (shrestham=encontrar, sreshtu=contro, Ro. catra, neologic double form contra). Also how come Thracian and Latin placenames are rendered in Romanian through Slavonic languages: Drystyr (Durostorum should have been Durustor or something if inherited directly from Latin), Barzava (from Berzovis, Berzovia Slavic contamination with B(y)rzava. Only Dunarea (Danube) and maybe Arges (with "dzh", "j" sound) are not from Slavic. DunaRea (compare with Oescus=>IskyR). Olt is from Slavic (a=>o), Harsova (with Slavic "h"). It is one thing to have Slavic/Bulgarian toponyms changed by Romanian way of pronunciation and a totally different thing to have Thracian and Latin, pre-Slav-arrival toponyms changed by Slavs (and eventually again modified by Romanians)

Bulgarian government should not yield to pressure on its veto against Serbia and FYROM EU membership: the West European "hotshots" should stay out of this: they have enough "domestic issues" to solve themselves, instead of teaching East European members how to behave: Britain 1. How democratic is for the Anglican Church to be called Church of England and for the English king/queen to be its chief? Separation of state and church is in UK very... Arabic 2. Northern Ireland, Gibraltar, the Falklands etc. Germany If the Germans are ok with Austria not belonging to Germany they have no business objecting to the unification of FYROM with Bulgaria (or of Moldova with Romania). Actually the Germans have a guilt complex: if a German says that Austrian nation was born in 1918 he is immediately accused of being Nazi (c'est tres tragicomique ca, no need to thank France and England for that, it was their pleasure). Of course Albania should receive a large portion of Western FYROM and we shouldn't forget about Greece (a small piece of territory would do, followed by a population exchange: Greeks from Northern Epirus to settled it)

Btw, on the Aromanians topic: a few years ago there was this Aromanian from Romania, Feca Dimu, who wanted to claim 15.000 ha of Bulgarian land, in Blagoevgrad district or close by. He had property papers from the Ottoman Empire (!). I suppose you should give the Turkish "monasteries" their lands back. Now on the new citizenship law of Romania: in 1940 all Romanian citizens subjected to population exchange who became Bulgarian citizens lost Romanian citizenship according to Craiova Agreement and 1947 Paris peace treaty. Giving them or their descendants the Romanian citizenship seems to be an outright violation of those international law acts. Also on the property items still in Romania that had been taken from Southern Dobruja soil during Romanian rule: it seems that some of the museum items (just an example) had been taken to Bucharest or Constanta museum well before 1940. All such items such be returned to Bulgaria. Also prepare ethnic maps of the Hungarian enclave in Romania. Use the Austrian-Hungarian censuses. For instance in 1900 in village x there were 0 Romanian, in village y 1, in village z zero; in 1910 in village x 1 Romanian, in village y zero, in village z zero. This means that there was an area made up by these villages (all of them with indigenous Hugarians). Compare with San Marino and Vatican (independent countries inside another independent country-Italy) and there you have it: historical arguments for independent Hungarian statelets or Hungarian exclaves. As for the 1918 "Romanian" population of Westernmost portions of Szatmar and Ugocsa counties (the westernmost portions now belonging to Romania): there were many villages with Hungarian-speaking Greek-Catholic (Uniate) or Orthodox "Romanians", that is Hungarians with Romanian identity. Those villages should never have belonged to Romania.

http://www.focus-news.net/?id=n1322480 http://paper.standartnews.com/en/article.p...p;article=31442 See this Mitko Yovanov "historian"s opinion that the Albanians "unjustifiedly" consider themselves victim of neighbor countries. Of course they are justified. Just look at the map with 100% Albanian villages in Kosovo and Western FYROM. So the "Macedonians" are right when they consider themselves "wrongfully" divided among neighbors but the Albanian have got the same right?